🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.